|
<sigh> Please forgive my country, as it seems | by adiplomat | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
I am looking forward to the US invading Holland! | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 01:19:27 |
|
Bush is correct. | by slayer | 2002-07-09 01:35:51 |
|
By the reasoning | by SaleGamine | 2002-07-09 01:41:55 |
|
That is my point. | by slayer | 2002-07-09 01:52:38 |
|
No, because that is another basic human right | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 01:57:35 |
|
Freedom of speech is not a human right | by slayer | 2002-07-09 02:06:35 |
|
Humans are not cruel | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 02:10:24 |
|
Oh yeah? | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 02:15:21 |
|
The fact that it is not respected | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 02:23:49 |
|
Sorry to disappoint you but it does. | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 03:02:18 |
| "Right" does not mean bullet-proof |
by tigermouse |
2002-07-09 04:50:42 |
>is your "right" of free speech bullet-proof? No of course it isnt! therefore it is not a right!
A "right" is something which should happen, "that which is just, morally good, legal, proper, or fitting" according to Dictionary.com, and "a legally, morally, or traditionally just claim". This does not make it guaranteed. Like a title provides proof of ownership but no "bullet-proof" guarantee that no one will steal my property, human rights are those things which should be allowed and protected in any just nation. The truth that there are unjust nations, or no perfectly just nations, does not make those things less right. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Seems that our definition of "right" are confused! | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 05:01:49 |
|
*Hurks enormous stone at breezeblock* | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 05:11:41 |
|
In whose eye? | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 05:22:02 |
|
...and furthermore! | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 05:53:57 |
|
Well with arguments like that... | by The Moose | 2002-07-09 06:26:58 |
|
Now you're just being silly! | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 06:30:11 |
|
Just a quote that popped into my mind | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 06:38:12 |
|
Aaaggghh! | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 06:45:39 |
|
I still disagree, semantically | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 06:56:58 |
|
What if there were no more hypotheticals? | by adiPlomat | 2002-07-09 07:26:19 |
|
Nah, it's more fun in mine! (n/t) | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 07:42:30 |
|
I'm with you on this one. | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 10:54:27 |
|
mmm, okay | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 11:40:47 |
|
Naruki didn't say that at all. Reread hir post. | by flamebait | 2002-07-09 13:45:33 |
|
hmm, still reads that way to me | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 14:47:09 |
|
You keep using words you cannot define | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 15:11:56 |
|
Nooooo! | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 16:22:08 |
|
I'll make this as painless as possible... | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 18:24:51 |
|
Oh dear | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 19:35:38 |
|
For one thing, the definition you insist on using | by flamebait | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
2 for you, 0 for me. ;-( | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 15:23:52 |
|
Naruki, you're beautiful | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 16:45:59 |
|
why not? | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 16:35:39 |
|
There is a new lifeform called "throbble". | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 17:37:55 |
|
Throbbly ones, I spose | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 18:09:57 |
|
Slowly. | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 18:27:10 |
|
If these beasties exist | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 19:42:59 |
|
Rights... | by slacktime | 2002-07-09 15:37:03 |
|
Not bad at all, for a godchild. | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 15:57:51 |
|
Ahh but | by slacktime | 2002-07-09 16:10:35 |
|
Totally wrong. | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 17:36:42 |
|
Ah Naruki too bad | by slacktime | 2002-07-09 22:08:48 |
|
It would be nice | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 16:42:19 |
|
Exactly! a voice of reason! | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 15:28:42 |
|
Don't sweat it. | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 15:30:50 |
|
Just try me! | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 15:40:48 |
|
Wouldn't help. | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 15:58:56 |
|
Unfortunately there is! | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 16:13:37 |
|
hey, I scraped my knuckles! | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 16:37:36 |
