|
<sigh> Please forgive my country, as it seems | by adiplomat | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
I am looking forward to the US invading Holland! | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 01:19:27 |
|
Bush is correct. | by slayer | 2002-07-09 01:35:51 |
| By the reasoning |
by SaleGamine |
2002-07-09 01:41:55 |
The international war crime court has no reason to be.
And you have no right to make any comment about anyone else who commits atrocities in the name of his country. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
My point exactly (n/t) | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 01:42:51 |
|
Yes I know. | by SaleGamine | 2002-07-09 01:45:01 |
|
That is my point. | by slayer | 2002-07-09 01:52:38 |
|
No, because that is another basic human right | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 01:57:35 |
|
Yes. | by SaleGamine | 2002-07-09 02:02:23 |
|
Freedom of speech is not a human right | by slayer | 2002-07-09 02:06:35 |
|
It's in the | by SaleGamine | 2002-07-09 02:08:50 |
|
Humans are not cruel | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 02:10:24 |
|
Oh yeah? | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 02:15:21 |
|
The fact that it is not respected | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 02:23:49 |
|
Sorry to disappoint you but it does. | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 03:02:18 |
|
That same thing can be said | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 03:14:22 |
|
Much simpler than emotions. | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 03:50:39 |
|
Instinct, eh? | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 04:07:06 |
|
Not holding back | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 05:38:19 |
|
"Right" does not mean bullet-proof | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 04:50:42 |
|
Seems that our definition of "right" are confused! | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 05:01:49 |
|
*Hurks enormous stone at breezeblock* | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 05:11:41 |
|
In whose eye? | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 05:22:02 |
|
...and furthermore! | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 05:53:57 |
|
Well with arguments like that... | by The Moose | 2002-07-09 06:26:58 |
|
Now you're just being silly! | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 06:30:11 |
|
Just a quote that popped into my mind | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 06:38:12 |
|
Aaaggghh! | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 06:45:39 |
|
I still disagree, semantically | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 06:56:58 |
|
What if there were no more hypotheticals? | by adiPlomat | 2002-07-09 07:26:19 |
|
Nah, it's more fun in mine! (n/t) | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 07:42:30 |
|
I'm with you on this one. | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 10:54:27 |
|
mmm, okay | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 11:40:47 |
|
Naruki didn't say that at all. Reread hir post. | by flamebait | 2002-07-09 13:45:33 |
|
hmm, still reads that way to me | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 14:47:09 |
|
You keep using words you cannot define | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 15:11:56 |
|
Nooooo! | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 16:22:08 |
|
I'll make this as painless as possible... | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 18:24:51 |
|
Oh dear | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 19:35:38 |
|
For one thing, the definition you insist on using | by flamebait | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
2 for you, 0 for me. ;-( | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 15:23:52 |
|
Naruki, you're beautiful | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 16:45:59 |
|
why not? | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 16:35:39 |
|
There is a new lifeform called "throbble". | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 17:37:55 |
|
Throbbly ones, I spose | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 18:09:57 |
|
Slowly. | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 18:27:10 |
|
If these beasties exist | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 19:42:59 |
|
Rights... | by slacktime | 2002-07-09 15:37:03 |
|
Not bad at all, for a godchild. | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 15:57:51 |
|
Ahh but | by slacktime | 2002-07-09 16:10:35 |
|
Totally wrong. | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 17:36:42 |
|
Ah Naruki too bad | by slacktime | 2002-07-09 22:08:48 |
|
It would be nice | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 16:42:19 |
|
Exactly! a voice of reason! | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 15:28:42 |
|
Don't sweat it. | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 15:30:50 |
|
Just try me! | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 15:40:48 |
|
Wouldn't help. | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 15:58:56 |
|
Unfortunately there is! | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 16:13:37 |
|
hey, I scraped my knuckles! | by tigermouse | 2002-07-09 16:37:36 |
|
Bush has a simple reason too. | by slayer | 2002-07-09 02:17:36 |
|
So Kuwait is US territory? | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 02:21:03 |
|
I didn't say US territory. | by slayer | 2002-07-09 02:24:30 |
|
So what you are saying is the reason is greed | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 02:27:57 |
|
"Acquisition of resources" | by slayer | 2002-07-09 02:34:21 |
|
Not your land | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 02:49:21 |
|
But those resources aren't yours | by SaleGamine | 2002-07-09 04:48:05 |
|
Bush ONLY has simple reasons. | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 10:56:51 |
|
This is like reading "Thomas Hobbes" - "Leviathan" | by Spisefisken | 2002-07-09 03:44:31 |
|
D&D alignment of GWB | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 03:57:37 |
|
Hmm, | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-07-09 04:34:25 |
|
So what you are saying here is.. | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 04:38:25 |
|
Ooo. I like it. ;) (n/t) | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-07-09 04:41:54 |
|
Cursed Pretzel of Strangulation +3 | by adiplomat | 2002-07-09 04:49:35 |
|
ROFL... Can't breathe... too... appropriate | by Ravenlock | 2002-07-09 13:15:51 |
|
Actually.. | by txdadu | 2002-07-09 09:41:22 |
|
WHERE do you think you have freedom | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 10:44:40 |
|
Awwww | by SaleGamine | 2002-07-09 02:03:49 |
|
On that same note.. | by Eco | 2002-07-09 02:03:57 |
|
Bush does have the right. | by slayer | 2002-07-09 02:13:15 |
|
That is your right | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 02:17:26 |
|
That would be interesting...(n/t) | by t95_jas | 2002-07-09 02:20:11 |
|
The EU would have that right. | by slayer | 2002-07-09 02:28:00 |
|
In that case, | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 02:29:47 |
|
It's not you. Slayer would probably feel | by adiplomat | 2002-07-09 02:33:46 |
|
I admit I'm Machiavellian. | by slayer | 2002-07-09 02:51:44 |
|
Noone ever said... | by Eco | 2002-07-09 02:54:41 |
|
But the global climate | by slayer | 2002-07-09 03:12:45 |
|
The big kid gets the best toys huh? | by Eco | 2002-07-09 03:32:21 |
|
Good post | by SE-sPOON | 2002-07-09 05:32:18 |
|
Certainly looks that way doesn't it? | by SaleGamine | 2002-07-09 05:49:05 |
|
Heck, we won't even pay dues in the club we | by adiPlomat | 2002-07-09 07:43:50 |
|
Hmmm | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 02:56:20 |
|
I will share my widom, grasshopper | by slayer | 2002-07-09 03:01:23 |
|
Back to might makes right? | by SaleGamine | 2002-07-09 05:24:29 |
|
Wait up... | by Eco | 2002-07-09 02:34:29 |
|
The agreement was between the coalition | by slayer | 2002-07-09 02:46:30 |
|
And the US now attacks | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 02:47:48 |
|
Or threats, anyway | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 02:48:21 |
|
Britain and the US are the only active members. | by slayer | 2002-07-09 02:54:20 |
|
Does anyone besides me.. | by Eco | 2002-07-09 02:56:39 |
|
Yes. | by SaleGamine | 2002-07-09 05:02:04 |
|
Not all of us, but a lot of our leadership. :+( | by adiplomat | 2002-07-09 05:18:48 |
|
Could be. | by SaleGamine | 2002-07-09 05:41:03 |
|
Darn straight! I'll blacken the eye of anyone who | by adiPlomat | 2002-07-09 07:36:52 |
|
Depends on the order. | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 11:04:28 |
|
He did say "legal orders" | by SaleGamine | 2002-07-09 11:13:28 |
|
True. | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 11:25:59 |
|
That is a very good point (n/t) | by SaleGamine | 2002-07-09 14:09:06 |
|
Most troops do get an indoctrination about legal | by adiPlomat | 2002-07-09 18:32:25 |
|
I agree. | by Naruki | 2002-07-09 18:39:40 |
|
Active members? | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 02:59:24 |
|
Active members | by slayer | 2002-07-09 03:02:41 |
|
I dont remember attacks of Iraq on US or UK....... (n/t) | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 03:04:01 |
|
They attacked Kuwait | by slayer | 2002-07-09 03:06:51 |
|
Kuwait =! US OR UK (n/t) | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 03:15:59 |
|
I didn't say it did. | by slayer | 2002-07-09 03:26:31 |
|
Why don't we ask the Kuwaitis their | by adiplomat | 2002-07-09 03:28:58 |
|
Short memory! | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 03:09:31 |
|
Ok | by bavvy | 2002-07-09 03:15:26 |
|
Yep, and... | by digitig | 2002-07-09 07:06:20 |
|
Touchy subject! | by breezeblock | 2002-07-09 07:27:53 |
|
The US does not fund the IRA. Some idiots | by adiPlomat | 2002-07-09 07:34:53 |
|
Remember Bush's recent op? | by digitig | 2002-07-09 07:03:13 |
|
Still.. | by Eco | 2002-07-09 02:51:52 |
|
Well said. (n/t) | by SaleGamine | 2002-07-09 04:42:07 |
|
The peace treaty with whom? | by digitig | 2002-07-09 07:00:27 |