The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
<sigh> Please forgive my country, as it seems by adiplomat2006-11-19 12:55:59
  I am looking forward to the US invading Holland! by bavvy 2002-07-09 01:19:27
Really, I am laughing my @ss off about this new law that allows the US to invade the Netherlands (where I live, BTW). In The Hague they have raised this court that will handle war criminals. </br></br>

For some reason, Bush thinks that the US should not be judged, should they violate humanity or when they are accused of committing war crimes. If someone is in dutch jail awaiting his tribunal, they preserve the right to invade our country, an ally, to release the prisinor!
[ Reply ]
    Yes I know. by SaleGamine2002-07-09 01:21:20
      Actually... by Eco2002-07-09 01:22:13
        Pitr is evil, Bush is ignorant by bavvy2002-07-09 01:27:55
          That's even more frightening (n/t) by SaleGamine2002-07-09 01:30:54
          Not quite. BOTH are evil... by Naruki2002-07-09 10:24:14
            LOL by SaleGamine2002-07-09 11:03:12
    Bush is correct. by slayer2002-07-09 01:35:51
      But by what right by bavvy2002-07-09 01:40:25
        Yes. by SaleGamine2002-07-09 01:47:32
          Next thing by bavvy2002-07-09 01:50:32
          Exactly. by Eco2002-07-09 01:51:41
            And if they don't the whole point is lost. by SaleGamine2002-07-09 01:54:57
              contrary opinion...... by sumbusch2002-07-09 08:49:17
                You have points but by SaleGamine2002-07-09 09:59:22
                  Yes and.. by Eco2002-07-09 10:12:40
                  Not to mention we are NOT by Naruki2002-07-09 10:27:54
                    Didn't you hear about by Nea2002-07-09 10:41:07
                      Oooh, did it get the Wall, too? by Naruki2002-07-09 11:01:42
                        Yeah, it's gone. by Nea2002-07-09 11:17:31
                          Not since I got busted for spitting. by Naruki2002-07-09 11:23:17
                            That must have been by Nea2002-07-09 11:29:24
                              It started soft and slow... by Naruki2002-07-09 13:47:19
                                *chuckle* by Nea2002-07-09 14:07:23
                          Aaaaaaaaa! by SaleGamine2002-07-09 11:35:56
                  please note.... by sumbusch2002-07-09 22:40:22
                    Sorry, I didn't mean to make it look by SaleGamine2002-07-09 22:55:47
        Iraq gave up some national sovereignty by slayer2002-07-09 01:48:27
          Ok. You realise that turn about is fair play? by SaleGamine2002-07-09 01:52:34
            We don't have that right. by slayer2002-07-09 01:55:33
              Yes you do. by SaleGamine2002-07-09 01:57:17
              So... by Eco2002-07-09 01:58:28
                Very true. (n/t) by SaleGamine2002-07-09 01:59:03
                I agree (n/t) by bavvy2002-07-09 02:01:09
                It's no more a punishment by slayer2002-07-09 03:23:16
                  Down boy... by Eco2002-07-09 03:37:09
                    You'r absolutely right. by slayer2002-07-09 03:52:21
                      And Hence Hague.. by Eco2002-07-09 03:58:55
              Indefinite imprisonment by Pic2002-07-09 06:15:43
                <sarcasm>But that doesn't matter does it? by SaleGamine2002-07-09 06:30:50
                  They're plainly guilty of being unAmerican anyway. (n/t) by digitig2002-07-09 06:53:18
          That's the exact point! by bavvy2002-07-09 01:54:54
          But... by Eco2002-07-09 01:56:23
            Global politics doesn't mean global state by slayer2002-07-09 02:02:17
              United STATES, isn't it? by bavvy2002-07-09 02:05:17
                There is that. by SaleGamine2002-07-09 02:07:55
                  Good point! (n/t) by bavvy2002-07-09 02:12:45
                  Unfortunately, that question was resolved by adiplomat2002-07-09 02:19:24
                    Taxation without representation by digitig2002-07-09 06:55:33
                      Wrong war. The Civil War was "fourscore and by adiPlomat2002-07-09 07:38:52
              Having a special judiciary authority by SaleGamine2002-07-09 02:05:32
              Another but... by Eco2002-07-09 02:07:56
                Good example! by bavvy2002-07-09 02:12:01
              NO! by Naruki2002-07-09 10:36:41
                I don't think that is what slayer said. by flamebait2002-07-09 14:48:10
                  To a point, yes. by Naruki2002-07-09 15:22:26
                    I didn't say I agreed with him. ;-) by flamebait2002-07-09 15:34:15
                      I figured that. by Naruki2002-07-09 15:38:07
          Hmmm... So if I put a gun to your head, by adiplomat2002-07-09 02:13:52
            I do have that right by slayer2002-07-09 02:20:55
              I would say some pressure was involved by bavvy2002-07-09 02:25:17
                The same pressure, but not the same circumstance. by slayer2002-07-09 02:30:58
                  I agree by bavvy2002-07-09 02:34:22
                    It is normal. by slayer2002-07-09 02:37:57
                      Again by bavvy2002-07-09 02:51:19
                        Not twisted. by slayer2002-07-09 03:30:25
                          Peace cannot be brought by force by bavvy2002-07-09 04:12:58
                            Sure it can. by JPaganel2002-07-09 08:55:59
                              Vendetta by Argos2002-07-09 09:48:34
                              On T-Shirt by magedrake 00012002-07-09 13:01:07
              So now we're down to the truth. by adiplomat2002-07-09 02:31:49
                Nice strawman. by slayer2002-07-09 02:41:08
                  ANY agreement made under duress by adiplomat2002-07-09 02:45:32
              So what you are saying is : by SaleGamine2002-07-09 02:33:34
              Maybe that is why international law is started by bavvy2002-07-09 02:38:02
            No, he's saying by ToLazyToThink2002-07-09 06:41:04
              Seems to me that no one by nix2002-07-09 08:26:02
                Of Course... by Atanamis2002-07-09 11:17:33
      By the reasoning by SaleGamine2002-07-09 01:41:55
        My point exactly (n/t) by bavvy2002-07-09 01:42:51
          Yes I know. by SaleGamine2002-07-09 01:45:01
        That is my point. by slayer2002-07-09 01:52:38
          No, because that is another basic human right by bavvy2002-07-09 01:57:35
            Yes. by SaleGamine2002-07-09 02:02:23
            Freedom of speech is not a human right by slayer2002-07-09 02:06:35
              It's in the by SaleGamine2002-07-09 02:08:50
              Humans are not cruel by bavvy2002-07-09 02:10:24
                Oh yeah? by breezeblock2002-07-09 02:15:21
                  The fact that it is not respected by bavvy2002-07-09 02:23:49
                    Sorry to disappoint you but it does. by breezeblock2002-07-09 03:02:18
                      That same thing can be said by bavvy2002-07-09 03:14:22
                        Much simpler than emotions. by breezeblock2002-07-09 03:50:39
                          Instinct, eh? by bavvy2002-07-09 04:07:06
                            Not holding back by breezeblock2002-07-09 05:38:19
                      "Right" does not mean bullet-proof by tigermouse2002-07-09 04:50:42
                        Seems that our definition of "right" are confused! by breezeblock2002-07-09 05:01:49
                          *Hurks enormous stone at breezeblock* by tigermouse2002-07-09 05:11:41
                            In whose eye? by breezeblock2002-07-09 05:22:02
                              ...and furthermore! by breezeblock2002-07-09 05:53:57
                                Well with arguments like that... by The Moose2002-07-09 06:26:58
                                Now you're just being silly! by tigermouse2002-07-09 06:30:11
                                Just a quote that popped into my mind by bavvy2002-07-09 06:38:12
                                Aaaggghh! by breezeblock2002-07-09 06:45:39
                                I still disagree, semantically by tigermouse2002-07-09 06:56:58
                                What if there were no more hypotheticals? by adiPlomat2002-07-09 07:26:19
                                Nah, it's more fun in mine! (n/t) by breezeblock2002-07-09 07:42:30
                                I'm with you on this one. by Naruki2002-07-09 10:54:27
                                mmm, okay by tigermouse2002-07-09 11:40:47
                                Naruki didn't say that at all. Reread hir post. by flamebait2002-07-09 13:45:33
                                hmm, still reads that way to me by tigermouse2002-07-09 14:47:09
                                You keep using words you cannot define by Naruki2002-07-09 15:11:56
                                Nooooo! by tigermouse2002-07-09 16:22:08
                                I'll make this as painless as possible... by Naruki2002-07-09 18:24:51
                                Oh dear by tigermouse2002-07-09 19:35:38
                                For one thing, the definition you insist on using by flamebait2006-11-19 12:55:59
                                2 for you, 0 for me. ;-( by Naruki2002-07-09 15:23:52
                                Naruki, you're beautiful by tigermouse2002-07-09 16:45:59
                                why not? by tigermouse2002-07-09 16:35:39
                                There is a new lifeform called "throbble". by Naruki2002-07-09 17:37:55
                                Throbbly ones, I spose by tigermouse2002-07-09 18:09:57
                                Slowly. by Naruki2002-07-09 18:27:10
                                If these beasties exist by tigermouse2002-07-09 19:42:59
                                Rights... by slacktime2002-07-09 15:37:03
                                Not bad at all, for a godchild. by Naruki2002-07-09 15:57:51
                                Ahh but by slacktime2002-07-09 16:10:35
                                Totally wrong. by Naruki2002-07-09 17:36:42
                                Ah Naruki too bad by slacktime2002-07-09 22:08:48
                                It would be nice by tigermouse2002-07-09 16:42:19
                                Exactly! a voice of reason! by breezeblock2002-07-09 15:28:42
                                Don't sweat it. by Naruki2002-07-09 15:30:50
                                Just try me! by breezeblock2002-07-09 15:40:48
                                Wouldn't help. by Naruki2002-07-09 15:58:56
                                Unfortunately there is! by breezeblock2002-07-09 16:13:37
                                hey, I scraped my knuckles! by tigermouse2002-07-09 16:37:36
                Bush has a simple reason too. by slayer2002-07-09 02:17:36
                  So Kuwait is US territory? by bavvy2002-07-09 02:21:03
                    I didn't say US territory. by slayer2002-07-09 02:24:30
                      So what you are saying is the reason is greed by bavvy2002-07-09 02:27:57
                        "Acquisition of resources" by slayer2002-07-09 02:34:21
                          Not your land by bavvy2002-07-09 02:49:21
                          But those resources aren't yours by SaleGamine2002-07-09 04:48:05
                  Bush ONLY has simple reasons. by Naruki2002-07-09 10:56:51
              This is like reading "Thomas Hobbes" - "Leviathan" by Spisefisken2002-07-09 03:44:31
                D&D alignment of GWB by bavvy2002-07-09 03:57:37
                  Hmm, by Blackbyrd22002-07-09 04:34:25
                    So what you are saying here is.. by breezeblock2002-07-09 04:38:25
                      Ooo. I like it. ;) (n/t) by Blackbyrd22002-07-09 04:41:54
                        Cursed Pretzel of Strangulation +3 by adiplomat2002-07-09 04:49:35
                          ROFL... Can't breathe... too... appropriate by Ravenlock2002-07-09 13:15:51
                    Actually.. by txdadu2002-07-09 09:41:22
              WHERE do you think you have freedom by Naruki2002-07-09 10:44:40
          Awwww by SaleGamine2002-07-09 02:03:49
          On that same note.. by Eco2002-07-09 02:03:57
            Bush does have the right. by slayer2002-07-09 02:13:15
              That is your right by bavvy2002-07-09 02:17:26
                That would be interesting...(n/t) by t95_jas2002-07-09 02:20:11
                The EU would have that right. by slayer2002-07-09 02:28:00
                  In that case, by bavvy2002-07-09 02:29:47
                    It's not you. Slayer would probably feel by adiplomat2002-07-09 02:33:46
                      I admit I'm Machiavellian. by slayer2002-07-09 02:51:44
                        Noone ever said... by Eco2002-07-09 02:54:41
                          But the global climate by slayer2002-07-09 03:12:45
                            The big kid gets the best toys huh? by Eco2002-07-09 03:32:21
                              Good post by SE-sPOON2002-07-09 05:32:18
                                Certainly looks that way doesn't it? by SaleGamine2002-07-09 05:49:05
                                Heck, we won't even pay dues in the club we by adiPlomat2002-07-09 07:43:50
                        Hmmm by bavvy2002-07-09 02:56:20
                          I will share my widom, grasshopper by slayer2002-07-09 03:01:23
                  Back to might makes right? by SaleGamine2002-07-09 05:24:29
              Wait up... by Eco2002-07-09 02:34:29
                The agreement was between the coalition by slayer2002-07-09 02:46:30
                  And the US now attacks by bavvy2002-07-09 02:47:48
                    Or threats, anyway by bavvy2002-07-09 02:48:21
                    Britain and the US are the only active members. by slayer2002-07-09 02:54:20
                      Does anyone besides me.. by Eco2002-07-09 02:56:39
                        Yes. by SaleGamine2002-07-09 05:02:04
                          Not all of us, but a lot of our leadership. :+( by adiplomat2002-07-09 05:18:48
                            Could be. by SaleGamine2002-07-09 05:41:03
                              Darn straight! I'll blacken the eye of anyone who by adiPlomat2002-07-09 07:36:52
                                Depends on the order. by Naruki2002-07-09 11:04:28
                                He did say "legal orders" by SaleGamine2002-07-09 11:13:28
                                True. by Naruki2002-07-09 11:25:59
                                That is a very good point (n/t) by SaleGamine2002-07-09 14:09:06
                                Most troops do get an indoctrination about legal by adiPlomat2002-07-09 18:32:25
                                I agree. by Naruki2002-07-09 18:39:40
                      Active members? by bavvy2002-07-09 02:59:24
                        Active members by slayer2002-07-09 03:02:41
                          I dont remember attacks of Iraq on US or UK....... (n/t) by bavvy2002-07-09 03:04:01
                            They attacked Kuwait by slayer2002-07-09 03:06:51
                              Kuwait =! US OR UK (n/t) by bavvy2002-07-09 03:15:59
                                I didn't say it did. by slayer2002-07-09 03:26:31
                                Why don't we ask the Kuwaitis their by adiplomat2002-07-09 03:28:58
                            Short memory! by breezeblock2002-07-09 03:09:31
                              Ok by bavvy2002-07-09 03:15:26
                              Yep, and... by digitig2002-07-09 07:06:20
                                Touchy subject! by breezeblock2002-07-09 07:27:53
                                The US does not fund the IRA. Some idiots by adiPlomat2002-07-09 07:34:53
                      Remember Bush's recent op? by digitig2002-07-09 07:03:13
                  Still.. by Eco2002-07-09 02:51:52
                    Well said. (n/t) by SaleGamine2002-07-09 04:42:07
              The peace treaty with whom? by digitig2002-07-09 07:00:27
      i have to agree by magedrake 00012002-07-09 05:50:22

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)