|
|
Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
|
Crypto Thread | by Kickstart | 2002-06-22 04:00:03 |
| more analysis |
by DFreas |
2002-06-22 17:59:16 |
I figure now might be a good time to post my thoughts on this thing to see if anyone else can add what they've come up with. Anyway here goes:
1 is most likely meaninful by itself and in pairs as if it is meaningful in pairs only it produces a large number of letters that occur only once, which isn't likely.
3 must also be meaningful by itself and in pairs since it follows a 0 at the end of one word where said zero would more likely pair with the 6 before it into the 60 grouping or stand alone rather than make a 03 pair that occurs only once. It must also be meaningful in pairs because of the 32 grouping that occurs 4 times. (not a likely coincidence)
probable pairs: 32, 87, 13, 15, 12, 78 (but 78 only if 87 is thrown out)
The second to last word has some strangeness going on since the probable 13 and 32 pairs produce a word with two double letters shoved together. There can't be many such words so finding the ones that do exist might be a key to breaking this code (unless that word happens to be part of a proper name)
As someone has pointed out previously 87872 and 12131 both occur twice which is a rather strange coincidence. I see no way of applying the fact to finding a solution yet though.
I have also found no way of applying hints number 1 & 2 to anything at all.
Would greatly appreciate if others could add their thoughts to this thread and work towards a solution as I'm a bit stumped myself. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
further inspection reveals | by DFreas | 2002-06-22 18:17:19 |
|
dividing up the code | by DFreas | 2002-06-22 18:46:23 |
|
Why are you ignoring all the hints? (n/t) | by Kickstart | 2002-06-22 20:20:27 |
|
because I haven't figured out how to use them!!!nt | by DFreas | 2002-06-22 20:28:22 |
|
Also | by DFreas | 2002-06-22 20:36:30 |
|
|
[Todays Cartoon Discussion]
[News Index]
|
|
