The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Catholic stock anyone? by Gary_72002-06-16 19:08:35
  Excuse me? by hypersapien2002-06-16 20:23:14
    Tax-wise, yes... by DaNutBall2002-06-16 20:33:01
      The biggest difference between now and then by Blackbyrd22002-06-16 20:48:02
        ... by Sehmket2002-06-16 20:57:35
          Yes that's right. For those that aren't Catholic: by DaNutBall2002-06-16 21:33:27
            No, I agree, by Blackbyrd22002-06-16 21:59:51
              ... by Sehmket2002-06-16 22:19:06
                Once more by Blackbyrd22002-06-16 22:59:18
                  abortion by nkjv2002-06-16 23:17:43
                    So, what you are saying is by Blackbyrd22002-06-16 23:19:41
                      No response? by Blackbyrd22002-06-16 23:32:30
                        I never said that by nkjv2002-06-16 23:47:35
                          You didn't answer the question by Blackbyrd22002-06-17 00:04:29
                            sad by nkjv2002-06-17 00:20:39
                              We disagree then. by Blackbyrd22002-06-17 00:38:49
                                U dont read about this subject much do you? by Red.Sonja2002-06-17 00:59:34
                                You don't read my posts very well, do you? by Blackbyrd22002-06-17 01:27:31
                                Future Pregs Part 1 by Red.Sonja2002-06-17 02:32:00
                                Part 2 by Red.Sonja2002-06-17 02:32:37
                                Ah, documentation. by Blackbyrd2 2002-06-24 23:11:20
But you are showing only a marginal increase in premature births after a single abortion. (5% to 14%, the worst comparison. Although the US stats look much more favorable, I think even your worst case (E. European) stats are marginal)

While the risk increases for women with multiple abortions, I think you must have overlooked my point, yet again.

Let me re-iterate it for you.

Abortions, in my opinion, should be used only when there is a risk to the mother's physical or mental health. See the examples I mentioned before.

One would think that this would be a rarity in any woman's life, unless she was congenitally predisposed to high risk pregnancies, in which case, she would already be liable to have a higher risk of premature birth, or miscarriage. In those cases, other steps should probably be taken, depending on the woman's wishes regarding future offspring.

I believe you must still think I am advocating abortion as a means of birth control, as a convenience, when nothing could be further from the truth. However, we have already had this discussion. You feel that there is absolutely no circumstance in which an abortion should be considered. I disagree.
[ Reply ]

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)