| Catholic stock anyone? |
by Gary_7 |
2002-06-16 19:08:35 |
| I recently heard a report that the Catholic Church is considering selling stock as a way to raise money for projects. This seems odd to me. I can't help but wonder how the value of the stock is going to be determined. I mean the church, by its very definition, is a non-profit entity. If there's no profit, then what will they base the value of the stock on? Also if there's no profit involved, how will the church pay out dividends to the "shareholders"? It sounds to me like somebody didn't think this through. Or maybe I'm totally wrong in my assumptions. It's been a while since high school economics and even then I wasn't always clear on all the ins and outs of stocks. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
I haven't heard of a darn thing on that | by DaNutBall | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Excuse me? | by hypersapien | 2002-06-16 20:23:14 |
|
Tax-wise, yes... | by DaNutBall | 2002-06-16 20:33:01 |
|
The biggest difference between now and then | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-16 20:48:02 |
|
... | by Sehmket | 2002-06-16 20:57:35 |
|
Yes that's right. For those that aren't Catholic: | by DaNutBall | 2002-06-16 21:33:27 |
|
No, I agree, | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-16 21:59:51 |
|
... | by Sehmket | 2002-06-16 22:19:06 |
|
Once more | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-16 22:59:18 |
|
abortion | by nkjv | 2002-06-16 23:17:43 |
|
So, what you are saying is | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-16 23:19:41 |
|
No response? | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-16 23:32:30 |
|
I never said that | by nkjv | 2002-06-16 23:47:35 |
|
You didn't answer the question | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-17 00:04:29 |
|
Sacraments & Children | by ukufie | 2002-06-17 00:12:05 |
|
I dunno. | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-17 00:16:31 |
|
A little late... | by Sehmket | 2002-06-17 06:20:11 |
|
sad | by nkjv | 2002-06-17 00:20:39 |
|
We disagree then. | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-17 00:38:49 |
|
U dont read about this subject much do you? | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 00:59:34 |
|
You don't read my posts very well, do you? | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-17 01:27:31 |
|
And just to keep it in perspective | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-17 01:51:04 |
|
Ive thought about that and.... | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 01:56:35 |
|
And another thing | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 02:07:36 |
|
Yes I am reading them fine thank you. | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 01:53:21 |
|
I'm happy for you | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-17 02:08:57 |
|
Date Rape...From a woman who had an abortion | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 02:37:10 |
|
Thats not | by hyzenthlay | 2002-06-17 10:48:49 |
|
PAS | by red.sonja | 2002-06-18 04:47:18 |
|
Ok, let me be sure I understand. | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-24 23:44:58 |
|
Read this | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 02:46:05 |
|
I'll read this later this week. | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-24 23:25:28 |
|
OK, I can already see issues with this. | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-27 04:26:51 |
|
Just think about this one.... | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 01:54:48 |
|
This is just stupid, and so beside the point. (n/t) | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-24 23:23:20 |
|
Breast Cancer | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 02:29:16 |
|
You say it yourself at the beginning. | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-24 23:22:04 |
|
Here's some stats for you, | by Blackbyrd2 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
And some more, specifically about breast cancer | by Blackbyrd2 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
I looked over the article at the NEJM | by Blackbyrd2 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Future Pregs Part 1 | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 02:32:00 |
|
Part 2 | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 02:32:37 |
|
Ah, documentation. | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-24 23:11:20 |
|
Date rape/ abortion induced death part 1 | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 02:41:58 |
|
Part 2 | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 02:43:30 |
|
Part 3 | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 02:44:19 |
|
Nothing to refute? | by red.sonja | 2002-06-22 23:41:10 |
|
Excuse me? | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-24 22:55:13 |
|
Read my other post after this one | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 00:37:50 |
|
What about the other issues? | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-17 00:44:28 |
|
Jeeze. | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 01:03:20 |
|
Depends on the country my dear | by SaleGamine | 2002-06-17 01:24:14 |
|
:) | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 01:59:32 |
|
RIGHT ON BABY! | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 00:33:40 |
|
you bet | by ToLazyToThink | 2002-06-16 23:06:19 |
|
Depends. | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-16 23:13:52 |
|
Not enough | by ToLazyToThink | 2002-06-16 23:34:08 |
|
I found one of those of my own, | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-16 23:38:17 |
|
Yes I must admit | by SaleGamine | 2002-06-16 23:49:28 |
|
encephalectomy?????? | by Spisefisken | 2002-06-16 23:55:27 |
|
I believe she refers to | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-17 00:05:30 |
|
Yes, that way we can be really sure, he | by SaleGamine | 2002-06-17 01:08:05 |
|
:) | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 01:10:49 |
|
Another big one for me.. | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 01:09:39 |
|
Addition to last... | by Red.Sonja | 2002-06-17 01:15:55 |
|
Another late post. | by Sehmket | 2002-06-17 06:45:02 |
|
Catholic Church | by nkjv | 2002-06-16 23:06:32 |
|
... | by Sehmket | 2002-06-17 06:52:44 |
|
So, about $3.72 billion. | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-16 21:49:17 |
|
What? | by Sehmket | 2002-06-16 22:02:03 |
|
Hmm, calm down. | by Blackbyrd2 | 2002-06-16 22:46:09 |