UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Question of the Day!	by kickstart	2006-11-19 12:23:33
Three	by DaNutBall	2002-06-16 00:26:52
<GrammarGestapo>shouldn't have!<GrammarGestapo> (n/t)	by BlurOfSerenity	2002-06-16 00:29:33
shouldn't've...?	by Kickstart	2002-06-16 00:31:11
Amen to that	by DaNutBall	2002-06-16 00:35:09
"shouldn't of" isn't slang..	by BlurOfSerenity	2002-06-16 00:37:42
but you're using "of"	by CrazySteve	2002-06-16 00:42:03
sloppy speaking.....	by sumbusch	2002-06-16 01:06:23
Not so much the casualness..	by Blackbyrd2	2002-06-16 01:15:35
The appropriate phrase is "should not have" There is no 'of' in the phrase. So, if you want to make it look like it sounded, then 'shouldnuv' is fine (in that context,) but the phrase was typed as if 'of' was in fact the word appended to 'shouldn't'. In this case, it should have been written as 'shouldn't have' In other words, it wasn't written in the style you suggest.
[ Reply ]
you miss the point.....	by sumbusch	2002-06-16 06:43:10

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)