|
|
Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
|
Question of the Day! | by kickstart | 2006-11-19 12:23:33 |
|
Chaosophy.... | by Tars_Tarkas | 2002-06-13 06:59:19 |
|
Technically, Mumbo Jumbo | by Naruki | 2002-06-13 09:09:32 |
|
Technically... | by Tars_Tarkas | 2002-06-13 09:36:14 |
|
Totally incorrect. | by Naruki | 2002-06-13 09:54:27 |
|
You waskal wabbit. | by Tars_Tarkas | 2002-06-13 10:06:29 |
|
*delivers Acme rocket skates* | by Naruki | 2002-06-13 11:50:57 |
|
Oooooh! I've always wanted a pair of those!!! | by Tars_Tarkas | 2002-06-13 13:38:31 |
|
Nope. | by Naruki | 2002-06-13 14:35:14 |
|
See, Tars_Tarkas is a deist, and... | by mcnutcase | 2002-06-13 14:39:24 |
|
Actually, I'm a realist. | by Naruki | 2002-06-13 14:43:18 |
|
Hmmm... | by Tars_Tarkas | 2002-06-13 15:47:13 |
|
There are two basic types of gods. | by Naruki | 2002-06-13 18:54:58 |
|
I believe in Eris... | by Tars_Tarkas | 2002-06-13 19:42:33 |
| Nope, again. |
by Naruki |
2002-06-13 20:08:34 |
Just because we can't measure atomic movement with perfect accuracy, doesn't mean it is random. This is why I proposed the omniscient observer.
The probabilities exist in your mind, because you do not know all the variables, nor all the possible outcomes. It may always be impossible to know them - so what? That does not in any way prove the existence of chaos.
And I don't equate chaos with destruction (you seemed to think I do). Chaos is disorder, pure and simple. On a macroscopic scale, it certainly seems like there is a good portion of chaos, true. But order exists anyway, in spite of our inability to always recognize it.
Not really sure why you have to "believe" in a type 2 goddess that doesn't do much for you. Seems like an exercise in futility to me. But, if it makes you happy... |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Not true. | by Arcanum | 2002-06-13 21:52:14 |
|
|
[Todays Cartoon Discussion]
[News Index]
|
|
