The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Question of the Day! by kickstart2006-11-19 12:23:33
  Chaosophy.... by Tars_Tarkas2002-06-13 06:59:19
    Technically, Mumbo Jumbo by Naruki2002-06-13 09:09:32
      Technically... by Tars_Tarkas2002-06-13 09:36:14
        Totally incorrect. by Naruki2002-06-13 09:54:27
          You waskal wabbit. by Tars_Tarkas2002-06-13 10:06:29
            *delivers Acme rocket skates* by Naruki2002-06-13 11:50:57
              Oooooh! I've always wanted a pair of those!!! by Tars_Tarkas2002-06-13 13:38:31
                Nope. by Naruki2002-06-13 14:35:14
                  See, Tars_Tarkas is a deist, and... by mcnutcase2002-06-13 14:39:24
                    Actually, I'm a realist. by Naruki2002-06-13 14:43:18
                      Hmmm... by Tars_Tarkas2002-06-13 15:47:13
                        There are two basic types of gods. by Naruki 2002-06-13 18:54:58
As far as I am concerned, anyway.

1) the all powerful thingies.
2) the pretty doggone powerful thingies.

Now, #1 types are often given credit for creating existence, the universe, and fried chicken.

#2 types are usually just blamed for bad weather, lawyers, and unwanted pregnancies.

Quite often, the #1 types like to say that they are the ONLY gods in existence, and anyone who believes otherwise is a liar and a punching bag (or one of those shooting targets, depending on your heathen-bashing weapon of choice).

The #2 types usually don't care if you _believe_ in other #2 types, but they prefer it if you only worship one of them. These are the ones who are prone to fits of jealousy and curious pubic rashes.

I do not actually believe in either type. You seem to believe in the type 2, or some mamby pamby type 1 that is so pathetic it can't seem to convince humans it is the only god in existence. I'm not sure why you would do that, but that's your problem.

There is no "underlying Chaos". Your refusal to accept or even think about that is the crux of our disagreement, I think. At the most basic levels (possibly atomic and smaller), things are incredibly well-organized. Calling an electron "chaotic" is just silly. Putting them together and watching their behavior, an omniscient being would most likely be completely unsurprised at how perfectly regular they behave. No such thing as chaos.

Too bad we are not omniscient.
[ Reply ]
                          I believe in Eris... by Tars_Tarkas2002-06-13 19:42:33
                            Nope, again. by Naruki2002-06-13 20:08:34
                              Not true. by Arcanum2002-06-13 21:52:14

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)