The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Question of the Day! by kickstart2006-11-19 12:23:33
  Chaosophy.... by Tars_Tarkas2002-06-13 06:59:19
    Technically, Mumbo Jumbo by Naruki2002-06-13 09:09:32
      Technically... by Tars_Tarkas2002-06-13 09:36:14
        Totally incorrect. by Naruki 2002-06-13 09:54:27
If the god says, "I am the only god" and he's serious, then he's either lying (in which case you're screwed) or he's really the only god. Therefore, if another god says the same thing, then either he's lying (which isn't possible, since he doesn't exist), or you're full of crap for thinking he's a god. You might be anyway, if the first one wasn't a god, either.

Moving right along:

If I can imagine it, is it then Real?
Are you making a statement? This is obviously nothing I've said, so you're not quoting me. My answer would be, "Of course not, don't be a tool."

And furthermore, Reality is the original inkblot test. You interpret what you can't understand in the pure, unaltered sense.
Not quite, my analogy-challenged friend. Reality simply is what is. Your interpretation of it would be the test, if someone was there to analyse it. The thing about the test, though, is that it's not about the real shape at all - it's only about your mental state and the means of dicovering your inner feelings. I, on the other hand, am much more interested in the real shape than on what my interpretation says about me. Just because I might see a pink elephant, doesn't mean my peanut collection will disappear.

So you try to make sense of the Chaos and you assign ideas and concepts to the different patterns you perceive in the Chaos.
Whoops! Classic error in logic, there. Chaos was not part of the "test", REALITY was. The chaos is only in your mind. And avoiding reality only makes the chaos stronger.

Perhaps I shouldn't save a seat for you, after all. Seems like I'll be dead of old age before you might show up, and there are others waiting.

[ Reply ]
          You waskal wabbit. by Tars_Tarkas2002-06-13 10:06:29
            *delivers Acme rocket skates* by Naruki2002-06-13 11:50:57
              Oooooh! I've always wanted a pair of those!!! by Tars_Tarkas2002-06-13 13:38:31
                Nope. by Naruki2002-06-13 14:35:14
                  See, Tars_Tarkas is a deist, and... by mcnutcase2002-06-13 14:39:24
                    Actually, I'm a realist. by Naruki2002-06-13 14:43:18
                      Hmmm... by Tars_Tarkas2002-06-13 15:47:13
                        There are two basic types of gods. by Naruki2002-06-13 18:54:58
                          I believe in Eris... by Tars_Tarkas2002-06-13 19:42:33
                            Nope, again. by Naruki2002-06-13 20:08:34
                              Not true. by Arcanum2002-06-13 21:52:14
                    Actually I'm a confused, by Tars_Tarkas2002-06-13 15:42:05
                  Missing basic premise of by Arcanum2002-06-13 15:01:13
                    Missing basic distinciton between by Tars_Tarkas2002-06-13 15:51:13
                  No! Wrong chaos! by Tars_Tarkas2002-06-13 15:40:30
                    No I don't. by Naruki2002-06-13 18:57:55
                      The idea... by Tars_Tarkas2002-06-13 19:14:31
                        Perhaps if you didn't stick with a word by Naruki2002-06-13 20:02:40

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)