|
<Deleted> | <Deleted> | 2002-06-11 10:38:12 |
|
Moderated for FYOS rule | by Nea | 2002-06-11 10:43:54 |
|
Not that I don't agree this wasn't appropriate, | by JPaganel | 2002-06-11 10:51:11 |
|
What if she's underdeveloped? | by NOLAWitch | 2002-06-11 10:57:07 |
|
she wouldn't? | by SNUGGLEBUNNIES | 2002-06-11 11:01:51 |
| it is |
by nawft |
2002-06-11 11:09:46 |
The idea is to protect those that have not been exposed to such things from exposure here.
Obviously there are many places for the innocent readers to be exposed to it on the net and in school (amusing sister anectdote goes here)
It is my belief that we do not wish to be the one's responsible for that corruption. Sure they'll get exposed to it, but not by us if we can help it.
I think fourteen is a wishful number more than an actual number. It's how innocent a child of that age should be. Sure some have sex at that age, do drugs, smoke, make sleazy films, but that's not how we would wish our Fourteen year old sister to be.
I sometimes wonder if 14 year old daughter would be better, but then I realize the care a lot of parents take of their children so I know that will still be just as argued. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
why not FYOB? | by Caius | 2002-06-11 11:18:00 |
|
Because we're chauvinists! | by special_ed | 2002-06-11 11:24:43 |
|
My family has chivalry! | by JPaganel | 2002-06-11 11:28:09 |
|
Keep that stuff to yourself! | by special_ed | 2002-06-11 11:29:05 |
|
A bit touchy about reatives, are we | by JPaganel | 2002-06-11 11:30:29 |
|
That's MR. Ed to you....umm...yeah... | by special_ed | 2002-06-11 11:34:38 |
|
You are getting agitated. | by JPaganel | 2002-06-11 11:48:25 |
|
If I'd known... | by special_ed | 2002-06-11 12:07:49 |
|
It's a good thing we're online, | by JPaganel | 2002-06-11 12:25:51 |
|
argh!!!!!!! | by UberDomino | 2002-06-11 12:30:35 |
|
Hay! | by special_ed | 2002-06-11 12:36:40 |
|
Arrgh! | by Pic | 2002-06-11 12:40:12 |
|
Are you kidding? | by JPaganel | 2002-06-11 12:40:40 |
|
Curses! | by JPaganel | 2002-06-11 12:41:25 |
|
You can't hit my van with your chivalry | by dire_lobo | 2002-06-11 12:04:35 |
|
*Sigh* | by nawft | 2002-06-11 11:37:39 |
|
This probably isn't the right place for this | by JPaganel | 2002-06-11 11:46:15 |
|
I'm not! | by special_ed | 2002-06-11 12:09:28 |
|
LOL | by Arienadean | 2002-06-11 12:15:38 |
|
Darn, you beat me to it. | by bugarup | 2002-06-11 14:23:13 |
|
well my kids | by Arienadean | 2002-06-11 12:10:50 |
|
valid points | by nawft | 2002-06-11 12:23:21 |
|
I'm ok with the rule | by JPaganel | 2002-06-11 12:28:58 |
|
Well I didn't | by Arienadean | 2002-06-11 12:52:32 |
|
It doesn't lead to an artist's site. | by Nea | 2002-06-11 13:19:38 |
|
ahh ok | by Arienadean | 2002-06-11 13:47:21 |
|
I'm not naked under my clothes. | by bugarup | 2002-06-11 14:19:28 |
|
Underwear != clothes? | by IByte | 2002-06-11 15:31:46 |
|
Then you agree with bugarup. | by Naruki | 2002-06-11 17:06:15 |
|
Oh dear. | by SaleGamine | 2002-06-11 16:30:48 |
|
explanation worth reading | by Caius | 2002-06-11 11:49:55 |
|
I agree with that. | by SaleGamine | 2002-06-11 11:57:16 |
|
Aye. | by bugarup | 2002-06-11 14:06:36 |
|
You talking about the | by Naruki | 2002-06-11 19:18:13 |
