UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

I'm So Sad...	by DennisNotOld	2002-06-07 15:03:27
And there's always...	by Capt. X	2006-11-19 12:55:59
the royal we are amused	by nawft	2002-06-07 19:23:17
Well, pua.	by Capt. X	2002-06-07 20:14:02
Why do you assume it will be a lady?	by Naruki	2002-06-07 20:17:46
It's traditional.	by Capt. X	2002-06-07 20:27:14
Royalty doesn't care much for same-sex marriages. There's too much fighting over who gets to wear the snazzy wedding gown. Of course, who's actually loving who (or what) after the ceremony is a closed-door affair that's none of us commoners' business. (It IS the tabloids' business, though, so if you're hoping for complete privacy, stay away from the windows and off the beaches. You listening, Fergie?) And who's urrrrrrrrrrrk? Sounds like they were named after a loud burp.
[ Reply ]
not all royalty marries	by nawft	2002-06-07 22:56:59
Yeah, I caught the "royal we" inference.	by Capt. X	2002-06-07 23:10:09
Do llamas HAVE beauty queens? (n/t)	by ADIPLOMAT	2002-06-07 23:20:47
perhaps. Just a standard coa procedure	by nawft	2002-06-07 23:43:24
There was only one true king.	by Capt. X	2002-06-07 23:59:25

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)