The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Aw heck, it worked for that Slashdot guy... by Capt. X2002-02-14 19:43:14
  Hooray for the Cap'n! by Kickstart2002-02-14 21:09:25
    Depends... by Arcanum2002-02-14 21:16:33
      Proposing in those ways by JPaganel2002-02-14 21:27:43
        and why do you think by crazysteve2002-02-14 21:31:53
          Because they are by JPaganel2002-02-14 21:39:15
            Wouldn't by Arcanum2002-02-14 21:45:41
              Yes, they would. by JPaganel2002-02-14 21:51:45
                I fail to see how by Arcanum2002-02-14 22:01:36
                  Allow me to clarify. by JPaganel2002-02-14 22:15:56
                    I know what you meant. by Arcanum2002-02-14 22:30:01
                      I said nothing by JPaganel2002-02-14 22:48:15
                        Yes, I would object... by Arcanum 2002-02-14 22:58:58
My point was that your statement seemed to be using similar contradictory logic. People generally want to see beautiful things. You said some arbitrary couple's love was beautiful, and your phrasing implied you didn't want to see it because it was beautiful. People generally don't want to share dirty and bad (i.e., undesireable) things with the people they love, but the statement I mentioned implies that you (generic you, not you personally) should share this supposedly bad thing with only the person you love most. Very similar illogic behind both statements.
[ Reply ]
                          I find by JPaganel2002-02-14 23:04:12
                            I know what you mean. by Arcanum2002-02-14 23:09:22

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)