The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Can anyone say dirty little nuclear device? by GodChild2001-11-09 00:10:18
  They exist by Zhanism2001-11-09 00:24:38
    Ah. Relative booms... by Avium2001-11-09 00:44:34
      Compared by mirage2001-11-09 00:53:52
        And how pray tell... by knightsofni2001-11-09 04:06:54
          A container built properly... by stoutman_20012001-11-09 10:12:10
            Umm by mirage2001-11-09 10:36:14
              Yeah by stoutman_2001 2001-11-09 12:09:33
But I'm sure one could come up with a lighter one. Course, this also means not being able to move as large a quantity of antimatter.

I'm told glass can be charged the way antimatter requires it to be. I've never actually heard any stories about anyone doing it tho, just that they've heard it could be done. So that's one rumor to be taken with salt, but if hte possibility is there, glass is light enough :) I doubt glass can take that kind of a charge tho.
[ Reply ]
                Antimatter? That would make a good bomb. by pecosdave2001-11-09 12:16:19
                  *LARTs* self by pecosdave2001-11-09 12:18:10
                  Actually, by stoutman_20012001-11-09 13:52:10
                    If you by mirage2001-11-09 15:12:36
                      Antimatter? Does that mean it doesn't matter?(n/t) by leistico2001-11-09 15:16:11
                        No... by stoutman_20012001-11-09 15:50:02
                      you don't need 10kg... by raptor_872001-11-09 15:56:41
                        I know by mirage2001-11-09 16:08:34

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)