The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

*nix on the desktop by mikosullivan2001-02-22 06:30:09
  RE: *nix on the desktop by Kraut 2001-02-22 08:10:12
mikosullivan wrote: >It started when my coworker described watching *nix newbies get upset >because they discovered that they couldn't undelete deleted files. I >said that I've always felt that *nix ought to have undelete ability, >and that lit the fire of the discussion. Well, me personally, i never used an undelete facility and i never missed it. I can remember only once, that i lost really valuable data. That was when i badly damaged the file system on a floppy disk while working with DOS. (Changing the disk at a very bad moment, DOS wrote the FAT from the old disk onto the new. That was quite long ago, when i used to store data on floppys.) No need to say, that there was no undelete facility for this kind of incident (despite the fact, that this was before DOS had any undelete thingys). For things like editing files, i often use CVS, so i am able to revert changes and - much more important - compare with older versions, to see what i have done and why i did. The rest is done by the backup tape. Unix is for people who know what they are doing and who think before they act. Unix is designed as a tool for people who are able to handle tools, not as an assistant that addresses to dumb users and thus tries to be smarter than the user. That's what makes Unix such a great tool. >My position is that if we want to get *nix (particularly Linux) on >the desktops of the world then we need to start addressing the wants >of the consumer. I don't want to get *nix on any desktop other then mine. I have Linux at home and Solaris at work, that's exactly what i want and so i'm happy. I don't care about other people's desktops. >We can make technical excuses until we're blue in the face about why >some utility can't be done, but the consumers will simply vote with >their desktops and Linux will never catch up with Windows. I see no need for an technical excuse for not having an undelete facility as long as i consider such a thing useless. >(As a tangent, the question is begged if the Linux world actually >WANTS to be on the desktop, as opposed to staying in the server >room. Products such as StarOffice and Gnome indicate that many people >in the Linux world do want Linux on the desktop.) Products such as StarOffice and Gnome might indicate, that they are currently people who want Linux on their own desktop. That doesn't mean that these people are up to become missionaries and persuade other people to get it as well. (Despite that fact that i avoid using this StarOffice-crap whenever possible.)
[ Reply ]
    agree... by Scheuri2001-02-22 08:16:21

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)