| webbastard wrote:
>Um.. this is NOT any kind of Democracy here. They do NOT have to give you any rights if they choose not to. It is THERE site, THEY have control of it. If they decide something doesn't belong on THEIR site, they have every right in the world to moderate, or remove it.
>Having read the moderated out stuff.. I really don't see any reason for them having to explain themselves. It was pointless and didn't even belong there.
>90% of the posts here are about 100 miles off target from what they should be, it makes reading the posts un-enjoyable most times because there is so much spam now.
"Off target from what they should be" - what's that, then. Your *personal*, *subjective* opinion if I'm not worng. Of course *that* matters, but what the rest of the board says shouldn't be taken into account - get some perspective!
>>>"Moderation based on personal opinion is an illigal activity and is contrary with the law for freedom of speech"
>If this was a governmental website.. you may be correct. But they do NOT have to follow any laws reguarding free speech.
See above. They don't have to, but they often do, because they are *nice* *people*. And even if they don't - if we hadn't complained, we wouldn't have know *what* their decision would be...
>Ok, I am wandering off here a little, and I have three plants I need to log into and fix now ..
"Wandering off" - ooh dear, better get kickstart to moderate you, hadn't I?
>Discusss,
But of course we will! Does the term *discussion* board mean anything to you?
>whine, bitch,
Like you're not...
>run to mommy and cry on her shoulder amungst yourselves.
Correct. You've just grasped one facet of what a *community* is.
>If lucky, I may have an old, dirty tissue for you to dry your eyes.
cat msg | grep flamebait > /dev/null
</spleen> (Wow! I used that tag, and *not* on Naruki! I'm feeling all faint...) |
