The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Umm... language? by TDS2000-11-22 09:29:21
  RE: Umm... language? by Freakdog2000-11-22 09:34:00
    RE: Umm... language? by TDS2000-11-22 09:36:53
      For Both your info... by Eli2000-11-22 09:53:34
        RE: For Both your info... by TDS2000-11-22 10:01:38
          just fyi-"flaming faggot" by anonymous 2000-11-22 20:37:37
>Yep. No problem with "fag". You see the problem here? :-) Cultural differences can be such a blast. faggot: 1.[From the Latin word meaning bundle of sticks] A male homosexual.a term applied to gays during the Inquisition when they were burned along with witches. The first record use of the word faggot in the USA was, in reference to homosexuals, was 1914 in a vocabulary of criminal slang published in Portland Oregon. the above is from http://www.hurricane.net/~wizard/19f.html The men were tied together and lit on fire - "fag" was used in reference to the definition of "faggot" that refers to a bundle of wood tied together by a rope. (Note the common use of the term "flaming fag".)
[ Reply ]
            Could you clarify? by Naruki2000-11-22 20:53:38
              Clarification by anonymous2000-11-22 21:03:21
                Thanks. by Naruki2000-11-22 21:22:17
                  I must have missed that. by anonymous2000-11-22 21:27:11
                    It's not at all by Naruki2000-11-22 21:36:51
                      Danke sehr by anonymous2000-11-22 21:38:54
                        Last try. by anonymous2000-11-22 21:41:26
                RE: Clarification by marnanel2000-11-24 04:50:00

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)